Electronic Portfolio
The University of
Pennsylvania's
Science Teacher Institute
Master of Integrated
Science Education Program
|
Use
of New Pedagogical Knowledge in Designing Instruction –
The participant has demonstrated the application of
improved knowledge of educational theory in the design of teaching
materials or lessons used in his or her own classroom. |
Related
Course - EDUC 536
-
TEACHING AND LEARNING MIDDLE
SCHOOL SCIENCE
In this course, we had to write a set of lesson plans. I thought that I
did a good job with my plan. I read my teacher's guide and included
some of the basic activities. In the lesson template, they are called
"CORE LEARNING ACTIVITIES". The complete document is attached below,
but I will pull out some keywords to give a general idea of the lessons:
ORIGINAL CORE LEARNING
ACTIVITIES:
Day 1. The teacher will
read .... Student should take note of the definitions ....The teacher
will display an overhead transparency .... The teacher will model how
to make a flow chart, and then the students will make ....
Day 2. ... show students an animation
.... make connections.
Day 3. ...review homework.... Engage
students in a discussion....Review
the lab activity.... discuss the analysis of the lab....clarify any
questions.
My instructor made comments about my work using the "Track Changes"
option in Microsoft Word, so you can view his his complete editing
suggestions by linking to the document. I have to include what he said
because it was a huge wake-up call for me:
INSTRUCTOR'S
COMMENTS:
"Please
explain why you chose
“reading about science” as a strategy that best helps students
to
develop conceptual understanding
at this stage. I did not see anything in your description
of the
class to suggest that students
cannot read on their own.
What do
the students learn copying
their rock cycle flow chart from their textbook onto a
sheet
of paper?
How can
you give the students a more
active role in exploring ideas and constructing
understanding?
I can’t
think of a good reason to
have the lab follow all the reading and charting. It should be first.
Engage
the students in exploration
through hands-on activity first. Then let them develop the explanations
and read the book and learn or memorize the terms. I can’t imagine that
the research on learning about the rock cycle told you that all these
charts and reading is how students best learn that processes that take
thousands to millions of years can change one thing slowly into
another.
Seeing
sediments in a rock helps you
to place it in the sedimentary rock box. Seeing crystals in an
igneous
rock helps you to put in a
box where rocks that have been melted then cooled and
crystallize
belong. Seeing a deformed
metamorphic rock helps you to understand that pressure
deforms
things and so deformed rocks
belong in the metamorphic box. Squeezing two small sticked
pieces
of modeling clay so that the
clay gets deformed and stretched also helps you to do this – you
feel
the pressure and you see the
change with your eyes. Readings and cartoons can follow.
My ideas of
lesson planning needed to be
modified, to say the least, so
that is what I did. My revised lessons were much more engaging, using
hands-on labs and activities.
REVISED
CORE ACTIVITIES:
Day 1. Students will complete the
“performance-based lab” (see lab
sheet) in which students
use sugar cubes to represent rocks. The
sugar goes through heating and
cooling, and at
each stage can be equated to sedimentary,
magma, igneous rock, and
metamorphic
rock.
Day 2. Students will complete the
“Metamorphic Mash” Lab (see lab
sheet) in which students
use clay to model pressure. The students
will observe the layering
behaviors of the
materials used.
Day 3. Students will complete the
“Crystal Growth” Lab (see lab sheet)
in which students use
magnesium sulfate to model the
crystallization processes at different
rates of cooling.
The students will observe three different
rocks, and compare their
results to those
rocks.
E-Portfolio
Home Page