UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - AFRICAN STUDIES CENTER |
Fromuwvax!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohiostate.edu!sdd.hp.com!sgiblab!sgigate!sg
i!cdp!woa
Fri Apr 23 10:19:19 CDT 1993
Article: 14450 of soc.culture.african
Path: uwvax!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-
state.edu!sdd.hp.com!sgiblab!sgigate!sgi!cdp!woa
From: The Washington Office on Africa
AFRICA POLICY PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE
The Washington Office on Africa (WOA), a lobbying organization, was
founded in 1972 by a coalition of religious denominations and trade
unions. The Washington Office on Africa Educational Fund (WOAEF) was
approved as a 501(c)(3) organization in 1978. The mandate of both
organizations was to support the movement for freedom from white-
minority rule in southern Africa, and to serve as a resource for the
broader anti-apartheid network, including churches, unions, other anti-
apartheid groups and a wide variety of other non-governmental
organizations.
Since 1990 the Washington Office on Africa has expanded its scope of
work beyond southern Africa to issues affecting grassroots African
interests throughout the continent. And the WOAEF has been transformed
into the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC), also with a continent-
wide mandate.
APIC will provide new resources for building a wider public constituency
on African issues. In particular, it will
* identify critical policy issues in U.S./African relations;
* bring in diverse perspectives from African and North
American grassroots groups and scholars as well as govern-
mental and non-governmental participants in the policy
process;
* make information and analysis accessible to a broad range of
U.S. public constituencies.
Later this year we expect to be able to provide occasional shorter
documents on-line through posting to Peacenet and other electronic
bulletin boards and conferences. This initial posting is to introduce
us, and to announce several of our publications we think are of wider
interest to the Africa constituency.
(1) APIC, **AFRICA'S PROBLEMS....AFRICAN INITIATIVES**
**Africa's Problems....African Initiatives** brings together, in a
convenient and readable format 48 pages in length, three major policy
documents that have emerged in recent years out of extensive discussion
among African leaders, intellectuals, and grass-roots groups. They
reflect a growing consensus that Africa's problems need creative new
solutions that stem from Africa's people.
*The African Alternative Framework to Structural Adjustment Programmes
(1989)*, the *African Charter for Popular Participation in Development
and Transformation (1990)*, and *The Kampala Document: Towards a
Conference on Security, Stability, Development and Cooperation in Africa
(1991)*, are fundamental documents outlining alternatives to past
policies and to the rigid prescriptions of international financial
agencies.
**Africa's Problems....African Initiatives**, edited by William Minter,
includes abridged versions of all three documents. It is designed as a
reference for scholars and activists, and as a resource for courses in
African and international studies. Published September 1992. Price
$5/copy.
(2) *The Bush Legacy and Southern Africa: A Post-Cold War Balance Sheet*
The Winter 1993 issue of **Washington Notes on Africa** systematically
examines the record of the Bush administration on South Africa and the
southern African region, including Zaire, Angola, Malawi and Mozambique.
Bush policies favored the new-look apartheid regime under President de
Klerk, and found excuses for dictatorial U.S. clients such as Mobutu in
Zaire and Savimbi in Angola. The Bush legacy still weighs heavily on
the future, because of the accumulated problems and because there are
real doubts how extensively the Clinton administration will simply
follow in the same tracks. Price $1/copy.
(3) **Apartheid's Legacy & Southern Africa in the '90s**. A reflective
look at the still burning issues involved in the transition from
apartheid to democracy, as well as the long-term problems confronting
South Africa and the southern African region. Topics include: Violence
and the Rule of Law, Democracy and Participation, Development and
Relief, Equity and the Challenge of Poverty, Regional Cooperation.
Price: $2.00/copy. Fall 1991.
Please make checks payable to APIC, 110 Maryland Ave. NE, Suite 112E,
Washington, D.C. 20002, (202) 546-7961. Add 15% for postage and
handling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary description of documents in **Africa's Problems...African
Initiatives** follows:
The *African Alternative Framework to Structural Adjustment Programs for
Socio-Economic Recovery and Transformation (AAF-SAF)* originated from
studies by Adebayo Adedeji and other economists at the United Nations
Economic Commission for Africa, in Addis Ababa, and was originally
presented as a proposed framework in July 1989. Intended as an
alternative to orthodox prescriptions presented by international
agencies such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, the
draft was welcomed as "a basis for constructive dialogue" by the United
Nations General Assembly in November that year. Only one country, the
United States, voted against the resolution.
The *African Charter for Popular Participation in Development and
Transformation* was adopted in Arusha, Tanzania, in February 1990, at
the end of the International Conference on Popular Participation in the
Recovery and Development Process in Africa. The conference was a
collaborative effort between African people's organizations, African
governments and United Nations agencies. It emerged from suggestions by
non-governmental organizations to the 1988 mid-term review of the United
Nations Programme of Action for African Economic Recovery and Develop-
ment, 1986-1990 (UN-PAAERD).
*The Kampala Document: Towards a Conference on Security, Stability,
Development and Cooperation in Africa* emerged from a gathering in 1991
that was convened at the initiative of the Africa Leadership Forum. The
Forum, a non-governmental organization involving former heads of state
and prominent Africans from many countries, is headed by Olusegun
Obasanjo. The Kampala Forum, in May 1991, was also co-sponsored by the
secretariats of the Organization of African Unity and the United Nations
Economic Commission for Africa.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excerpts from introduction, by Carol Capps, Church World
Service/Lutheran World Relief Office on Development Policy
Taken together the three documents open a window on African views of the
root causes of Africa's problems, and more importantly, the keys to
solving them. They speak with one voice about the central role of
African people in efforts to achieve much-needed political, social and
economic change on the continent. Yet each of these documents also
makes its own distinctive contribution to development thinking about
Africa, complementing and supporting the perspectives of the other two.
Each has a somewhat different primary focus -- on structural adjustment,
or popular participation, or security.
The unique contribution of the *African Alternative Framework to
Structural Adjustment Programmes (AAF-SAP)* is its challenge to
traditional thinking about structural adjustment as expressed by
multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund. During the 1980s, multilateral institutions and Northern
donor governments pressured increasing numbers of African governments to
adopt economic austerity -- or structural adjustment -- programs that
emphasized cutting government spending and balancing exports and
imports. The conventional wisdom was that such economic belt-tightening
measures, though bitter medicine, were essential to economic progress.
AAF-SAP challenged that view, pointing out instead that traditional
structural adjustment measures -- such as promotion of export crops --
tend to perpetuate and exacerbate Africa's underlying development
problems. It called for linking adjustment to a process of long-term
structural change in which human improvement would be the central goal.
Its message: "No program of adjustment or development makes sense if it
makes people indefinitely more miserable." Three years after
its release, AAF-SAP is still the best articulated challenge to
traditional structural adjustment programs on record.
*The African Charter for Popular Participation in Development and
Transformation* had a very different genesis from the AAF-SAP, though
the process which generated it also had strong support from the Economic
Commission for Africa. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) played a
central role in events leading up to the drafting of the Charter. The
conference that produced the Charter was proposed by NGOs and jointly
planned by NGOs and United Nations agencies. NGOs -- including grass-
roots groups -- participated in the conference on an equal basis with UN
agencies and African governments. The Charter itself was drafted by a
committee of NGOs, UN agencies, and African government representatives.
Of the three documents, the Charter is the closest to being a document
of the African people. Not surprisingly, it diagnoses the root causes
of Africa's problems as the failure to put people at the center of
development. It calls upon various actors -- governments, UN agencies,
Northern NGOs, African NGOs, and the people themselves -- to take
specific steps to promote popular participation. It includes a
definition of popular participation increasingly quoted in other UN
documents, by NGOs themselves, and by governments: "Popular
participation is, in essence, the empowerment of the people to
effectively involve themselves in creating the structures and in
designing policies and programs that serve the interests of all." The
African Charter is a landmark document: an expression of the will of
the African people at a moment in history when throughout the continent
"the people" are increasingly demanding a larger role in the important
decisions affecting their lives.
*The Kampala Document, Towards a Conference on Security, Stability,
Development and Cooperation in Africa*, in contrast, is a statement of
African leaders, including former and current heads of state, that
offers an African perspective on security and governance issues. It
defines security broadly, linking security to development and regional
cooperation. It wears proudly its African origins by grouping its key
principles under four "calabashes": security, stability, development and
cooperation.
The unique contribution of the Kampala Document is the way in which it
relates security and stability to the pursuit of people-centered
development. It defines security not simply in military terms, but
rather in terms of the ability of the individual citizen to live in
peace, have access to basic necessities, and participate freely in
governance. The document contains numerous references to popular
participation, including a reference to the Charter on Popular
Participation. It goes farther than earlier statements of African
leaders toward endorsing a cooperative approach to Africa's problems of
instability and political repression by laying out basic ground rules
for good governance and proposing continental mediation and peacekeeping
mechanisms.
Unquestionably, the primary importance of these three documents is that
they are a broad-based and internally consistent expression of African
perspectives on vital policy issues affecting Africans. I believe their
importance extends even further, however -- well beyond Africa. If we
are willing to listen, these voices from the African continent could
also help those of us who live outside Africa re-orient our thinking
toward more creative, people-centered solutions to the development
problems of our own societies.
Previous Menu Home Page What's New Search Country Specific