Marc Meredith Penn logo

Curriculum Vitae


Image

Contact Information
University of Pennsylvania
Department of Political Science
Associate Professor

Stiteler Hall, Room 238
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6215
Office Phone: 215-746-7672
Cell Phone: 215-264-2223
e-mail:
marcmere@sas.upenn.edu

 



Working Papers

    Abstract: How does America's high rate of incarceration shape political participation? Few studies have examined the direct effects of incarceration on patterns of political engagement. Answering this question is particularly relevant for the 93% of formerly incarcerated individuals who are eligible to vote. Drawing on new administrative data from Connecticut, we present evidence from a field experiment showing that a simple informational outreach campaign to released felons can recover a large proportion of the reduction in participation observed following incarceration. The treatment effect estimates imply that efforts to reintegrate released felons into the political process can substantially reduce the participatory consequences of incarceration.
    Abstract: In contrast to much of the previous literature, we argue that the partisan gender gap---the tendency of men to identify more as Republicans and less as Democrats than women---emerged because long-standing ideological differences between men and women became more relevant to party choices when the parties became more ideologically polarized. We hypothesize that education increased awareness of this ideological polarization and thus that the partisan gender gap emerged earlier, and is consistently larger, among the highly educated. We support this argument using both the American National Election Studies (ANES) and a novel large individual-level merged Gallup dataset. ANES data demonstrate that while gender differences in policy preferences are roughly stable over time and consistent across education levels, the highly educated detected party ideological polarization earlier and more strongly. Gallup data confirm, with precision impossible in existing datasets, that the partisan gender gap developed earlier, and remained larger, among the highly educated.
    Abstract: Previous work shows that candidates receive more personal votes, frequently called "friends-and-neighbors" votes, in areas where they have local attachments. This article examines heterogeneity in friends-and-neighbors voting near candidates' counties of birth and residence in U.S. statewide executive oce elections. Using two large datasets, I estimate how the magnitude of the friends-and-neighbors vote varies across candidate types, electoral environments, oces, and voters. Candidates' vote shares increase by substantially more in their counties of birth and residence than in neighboring counties. Candidates vote shares increase by more in home counties that are less populated and generally less supportive of their party. The salience of the office does not relate to the amount of friends-and-neighbors voting. Although incumbents and non-incumbents receive similar amounts of friends-and-neighbors votes, challengers who currently hold local or state-legislative oce receive more friends-and-neighbors support. Finally, I show that friends-and-neighbors voting decreased across time.
    Abstract: A substantial body of work shows that partisanship is the most important determinant of voter behavior in state and national elections, but little research has examined the relationship between partisanship and voting at the local level. We begin to fill this gap in the literature by looking at the role of partisanship in the 2009 Ohio and Pennsylvania school board elections. We first examine how the partisan identification of school board members matches their constituents. We find that, on average, school board members are less Democratic than theirconstituents. We then exploit a unique feature of Pennsylvania school board elections to estimate the effect of party endorsements on candidatesí vote shares. Candidates are allowed to run simultaneously for both the Democratic and Republican nomination, with the possibility of appearing on the general election ballot as a dual nominee. Thus we have the opportunity to compare the performance of candidates who win two nominations to those who win only one. Our point estimates from a regression discontinuity design based on close elections indicate that a second nomination is associated with vote share gains of 14 to 19 percentage points.


Published or Forthcoming Journal Articles

    Abstract: We investigate how the restoration of voting rights affects the political participation of ex-felons. Our primary analysis uses unique data from Iowa, which changed how ex-felons restore their voting rights in both 2005 and 2011. Prior to 2005, ex-felons had to apply to restore their voting rights. We show that ex-felon turnout increased after Iowa began to automatically restore these rights. Consistent with misinformation being a significant barrier to ex-felons' political participation, ex-felons were more likely to vote if they were informed about this policy change. The application requirement was re-instated for ex-felons discharged since 2011 and we show that this reduced their 2012 presidential election turnout. We conclude by comparing the actual turnout rate of recently discharged ex-felons in Iowa, Maine and Rhode Island to the turnout rate predicted by Uggen and Manza (2002). This comparison suggests that although restoration procedures can substantively affect ex-felon turnout, restoration procedures are not the only reason why ex-felons vote less often than observably similar non-felons.
    Abstract: We develop an incomplete-information theory of economic voting, where voters' information about macro-economic performance is determined by the economic conditions of people similar to themselves. We test our theory using both cross-sectional and time-series survey data. A novel survey instrument that asks respondents their numerical assessment of the unemployment rate confirms that individuals' economic information responds to the economic conditions of people similar to themselves. Further, these assessments are correlated with individuals' vote choices. We also show in time-series data that state unemployment robustly correlates with evaluations of national economic conditions, and presidential support.
    Abstract: Criminal disenfranchisement has become an area of great legislative ferment in the wake of the rise of the carceral state and the shadow of the 2000 presidential election. Previous research documents widespread confusion about who can and cannot vote among both people who have come into contact with the criminal justice system and election administrators. Such research, in concert with a wide-range of activists promoting the issue, has spurred a number of state legislatures to pass laws that require the state to notify ex-felons about their voting rights. The purpose of this paper is to better understand the policy processes that produce these notification laws and to assess whether these laws affect ex-felonsí registration and turnout rates. Data on discharges from the correctional system and voter files are collected from three states that have recently passed notification laws: New Mexico, New York, and North Carolina. We follow recent work that matches information in these two government sources to estimate the rates of ex-felon registration and turnout. Our findings show little evidence of an increase in ex-felon registration or turnout after notification laws are implemented.
    Abstract: Federalist democracies often hold concurrent elections for multiple offices that vary with respect to scope and scale. A potential consequence of simultaneously voting for multiple offices is that the personal appeal of candidates in a high-profile race affects electoral outcomes in less salient races. In this paper I estimate the magnitude of such coattail effects from governors onto other concurrently elected statewide executive officers using a unique data set of county election returns for all statewide executive office elections in the United States from 1987 to 2010. I exploit the disproportionate support that candidates receive from geographically proximate voters, which is often referred to as the friends-and-neighbors vote, to isolate variation in the personal appeal of candidates. The point estimates from my preferred specifications show that a one-percentage-point increase in the personal vote received by a gubernatorial candidate increases their party's secretary of state and attorney general candidates vote shares by 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points. In contrast, personal votes for a secretary of state or attorney general candidate have no effect on the performance of their party's gubernatorial and other down-ballot candidates.
    Abstract: Survey questions about quantities offer a number of advantages over more common qualitative questions. However, concerns about survey respondents' abilities to accurately report numbers have limited the use of quantitative questions. This paper shows quantitative questions are feasible and useful for the study of economic voting. First, survey respondents are capable of accurately assessing familiar economic quantities, such as the price of gas. Second, careful question design - in particular providing respondents with benchmark quantities - can reduce measurement error due to respondents not understanding the scale on which more complex quantities, such as the unemployment rate, are measured. Third, combining quantitative and qualitative questions sheds light on where partisan bias enters economic assessments: in perceiving, judging, or reporting economic quantities.
    Abstract: We investigate the effects of ballot order on the outcomes of California city council and school board elections. Candidates listed first win office between four and five percentage points more often than expected absent order effects. This first candidate advantage is larger in races with more candidates and for higher quality candidates. The first candidate advantage is similar across contexts: the magnitude of the effect is not statistically distinguishable in city council and in school board elections, in races with and without an open seat, and in races consolidated and not consolidated with statewide general elections. Standard satisficing models cannot fully explain ballot order effects in our dataset of multi-winner elections.
    Abstract: Forms of convenience voting, including voting-by-mail (VBM), provide citizens the opportunity to cast ballots without being exposed to the information revealed in the final weeks leading up to Election Day. This creates the possibility that informational differences will cause VBM and polling place voters to vote differently. We test this hypothesis by looking at whether the increased use of VBM at the precinct-level relates to candidatesí vote shares in the 2008 California presidential primary. An election administration policy in California in which all voters are assigned to VBM based on an arbitrary threshold of the number of registered voters is exploited to overcome the identification problem caused by the self-selection of voters into VBM. We show that the use of VBM affects the relative performance of candidates remaining in the race and increases the probability of selecting withdrawn candidates. Our findings have implications both for election administration policy and for the study of campaign effects in American elections. Election officials should consider waiting until closer to Election Day to send out mail ballots, or instruct people on ballots to make sure to wait until they are ready to make a decision before voting.
    Abstract: During the contest for Kansas attorney general in 2006, an organization sent out 6 pieces of mail criticizing the incumbentís conduct in office. We exploit a discontinuity in the rule used to select which households received the mailings to identify the causal effect of mail on vote choice and voter turnout. We find these mailings had both a statistically and politically significant effect on the challengerís vote share. Our estimates suggest that a ten percentage point increase in the amount of mail sent to a precinct increased the challengerís vote share by approximately three percentage points. Furthermore, our results suggest that the mechanism for this increase was persuasion rather than mobilization.
    Abstract: This paper uses discontinuities imposed by voting-age restrictions to identify the effect of past participation on subsequent participation decisionsand partisan identification. It compares participation decisions and partisan affiliations of individuals who turned eighteen just before past elections with those who turned eighteen just after. It presents three main findings. First, past presidential election eligibility increases the probability of subsequent participation. For example, I find that 2000 presidential election eligibility increased participation in the 2004 presidential election by 3.0 to 4.5 percent, which suggests that 2000 presidential election participation increased the probability of 2004 election participation by 4.9 to 7.3 percentage points. Second, participation in past presidential elections affects partisan identification. Third, these effects continue to persist for several election cycles after a voter first becomes eligible.
    Abstract: Although there are compelling theoretical reasons to believe that unequal political representation in a legislature leads to an unequal distribution of funds, testing such theories empirically is challenging because it is difficult to separate the effects of representation from the effects of either population levels or changes. We leverage the natural experiment generated by infrequent and discrete Census apportionment cycles to estimate the distributional effects of malapportionment in the U.S. House of Representatives. We find that changes in representation cause changes in the distribution of federal outlays to the states. Our method is exportable to any democratic system in which reapportionments are regular, infrequent, and non-strategic.
    Abstract: This paper focuses on the strategic timing of elections by agenda-setters in direct democracy settings. Because concurrent elections affect turnout, scheduling referenda for different elections will produce different median voters. I hypothesize that agendasetters with power over the timing of a referendum will schedule the referendum in conjunction with the other set of races that produce a policy closest to their preferred outcome. Consistent with the theory, I show that Wisconsin school boardsí use of special elections for school referenda are related to differences in the revealed preferences of voters in low and high turnout elections.
    Abstract: American voters are assigned to vote at a particular polling location (e.g., a church, school, etc.). We show these assigned polling locations can influence how people vote. Analysis of a recent general election demonstrates that people who were assigned to vote in schools were more likely to support a school funding initiative. This effect persisted even when controlling for votersí political views, demographics, and unobservable characteristics of individuals living near schools. A follow-up experiment using random assignment suggests that priming underlies these effects, and that they can occur outside of conscious awareness. These findings underscore the subtle power of situational context to shape important real-world decisions.


Published or Forthcoming Book Chapters

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen, Marc Meredith, and Erik Snowberg.  2011.  Sociotropic Voting and the Media.  In John Aldrich and Kathleen McGraw (Ed.), Improving Public Opinion Surveys: Interdisciplinary Innovation and the American National Election Studies. Princeton University Press.
    Abstract: The literature on economic voting notes that voters' subjective evaluations of the overall state of the economy are correlated with vote choice, whereas personal economic experiences are not. Missing from this literature is a description of how voters acquire information about the general state of the economy, and how that information is used to form perceptions. In order to begin understanding this process, we asked a series of questions on the 2006 ANES Pilot about respondents' perceptions of the average price of gas and the unemployment rate in their home state. In this chapter we analyze both the determinents and political consequences of respondents' percpetions of these economic variables. We find that questions about gas prices and unemployment show divergences in the sources of information about these two economic variables. Information about unemployment rates come from media sources, and are systematically biased by partisan factors. Information about gas prices, in contrast, comes only from everyday experiences. While information about both indicators show effects from demographics, only unemployment rates affect a respondent's political outlook. Moreover, perceptions of unemployment rates can be used to isolate the effect of economics on partisan preferences.