Temples Along the Indus

Michael W. Meister

 High above the mighty Indus,  on hills commonly called the Salt Range, stand important remains of forts with citadels and temples (Fig. 1). Built from the 6th to the 11th centuries AD, these structures lie in what was ancient India's far northwest (Fig. 3), now in the Panjab and North West Frontier provinces of Pakistan. Largely ignored by scholars in this century, and orphaned from the main stream of architectural scholarship since the partition of South Asia in 1947, these remains form an important link in the history of South Asian architecture. Remarkably, this region preserves an almost continuous record of temples that can define the evolution of a distinctive school of Gandhara-Nagara architecture. An integrated archaeological study of these sites, undertaken by the author with colleagues in Peshawar, has begun to reveal new aspects of this important period of South Asia's antiquity. What follows is a preliminary report and stylistic analysis of the region's temples.
 Archaeologically, the area is best known for the massive numbers of Buddhist sculptural and structural remains associated with the region of Gandhara from the 1st century BC to the 5th century AD. These Gandharan remains already show a local visual vocabulary in which architectural traditions from India, Central Asia, and the classical world appear side by side. This mélange of traditions is evident on many Gandharan Buddhist narrative steles, as well as monuments such as the famous shrine of the double-headed eagle and the Dharmarajika stupa at Taxila (Fig. 2).
 The Chinese pilgrim, Hsüan Tsang, visiting Gandhara in the 7th century AD, noted hundreds of Hindu structures along with many Buddhist sites then in decline (Watters 1904-05). If there is a Gandharan legacy in the Hindu temple architecture of subsequent centuries, it takes two paths: one, a unique tradition of temples with pyramidal roofs built in Kashmir from before the reign of Lalitaditya in the 8th century AD (Fig. 5), the other an independent tradition in Gandhara itself. Our project focuses on the consequences of this second tradition.
 We find perhaps the earliest example of the Kashmir tradition in two small 8th-century (or earlier) temples at Laduv (Meister et al. 1988 [hereafter EITA]: 361-63) and of temples related to the second tradition in several 6th-century masonry sub-shrines at the Hindu pilgrimage site of Katas in the Salt Range (Fig. 6). The square Laduv shrine has a circular interior space and had a hemispherical dome under a peaked roof, for which a Gandharan prototype-a masonry structure at Guniar in Swat-is sometimes cited (Kak 1933:55-56; EITA:362). The whole was once covered by a pyramidal roof, as indicated by the frame surrounding its doorway. Gandharan antecedents for this type can be seen in the "classical" niche pediments represented on the 1st century BC shrine of the double-headed eagle at Taxila, or the split pyramidal pediments in Gandharan sculpture and on stupas such as that shown in Figure 2. This distinctive gabled pent roof became the signature for Lalitaditya's powerful Kashmir dynasty in the 8th century. Well-preserved examples, from the 8th to 10th centuries, survive on temples at Narastan, Pandrethan (Fig. 5), and Payar.
 The type of temple found at Katas, while sharing with Laduv the formula of a simple square plan, plain masonry walls, and cantoned corner pilasters, formed its superstructure by quite different means. The Katas sub-shrine's elevation can be reconstructed as a series of cornices with tiny intermediate rows of pillars and a crowning ribbed stone (amalaka) (Fig. 6). This early type of simply storied structure has parallels in coastal western India at Sarnath (Saurashtra) and elsewhere across northern India and the Deccan in the 6th century AD (see Meister 1986; EITA).
 With its representation of many multiple stories, the Katas sub-shrine can be considered a type of proto-Nagara tower. However, local experimentation with the full Nagara formula-the typical curved temple form of northern India-had already begun at Kafirkot ("foreigners' fortress" in local parlance) west of the Indus in the North West Frontier Province (see Figs. 7, 8). The two earliest temples in this fort can most closely be related to early Garulaka or Maitraka dynasty temples in Saurashtra at sites like Bhanasara and Dhank, from the 6th and early 7th centuries AD, and Saindhava dynasty temples from the same region in the 8th century (see EITA: plates). Even the name of the little understood Saindhava dynasty seems to indicate a link with the Indus (Sindhu is an ancient name for the river).

 Scholars have tended to date this whole group of temples now in Pakistan to "post Islamic contact," that is, after the 7th to 8th century AD, because of their use of mortar, rubble-fill between masonry walls, arches, and squinched interior domes (Archaeological Survey of India Annual Report 1920-21:6-7). They have also tended to locate them as a branch of Kashmiri architecture, because of one aberrant temple (Fig. 4). Both Percy Brown (1942) and James Harle (1986), for example,  in their volumes on Indian architecture, place the Salt Range temples in chapters on the Kashmiri tradition.
 Nineteenth and early 20th century scholars, including Aurel Stein (1937), Alexander Cunningham (1872-73), and Ananda Coomaraswamy (1927), focused their attention on the 10th-century temple at Malot in the Salt Range (Fig. 4) and its formal links to the architecture of Kashmir, thus setting the direction for later scholarship. The temple at Malot does indeed mimic pent-roofed temples in Kashmir at a time of marital alliance between the Utpalas of Kashmir and the Hindu Shahi kings of Hund in Gandhara (Rehman 1979). It differs from the Kashmir temples, however, in placing the curvilinear Nagara shrine models on its walls (see box on Shrine Models). These shrine models mimic local Gandhara-Nagara temples at other 10th-century Hindu Shahi sites, such as a pair of temples in a second important fortress, Bilot (south Kafirkot), near Dera Ismail Khan (Figs. 1, 17).
 The Kashmiri form found at Malot, however, is an exception. Better sources for this Indus group of temples can be found in the Gandharan substrata and in the ferment of Nagara formation in other areas of north and western India (Meister 1981) than in Kashmir. Whether in the domed Buddhist compounds at Takht-i-bahi or the 5th-century moldings facing the Dharmarajika stupa at Taxila (Fig. 2), Gandharan antecedents are close at hand. Certainly the basic molding sequence of Gandhara-Nagara temples begins as early as Taxila. The typical slender pseudo-Corinthian pilasters at Kafirkot (Fig. 10)-as well as true arches-can be seen also on the 2nd/4th-century Buddhist stupa at Guldhara in Afghanistan (Harle 1986:73). The characteristic sloping batter of niches and doorways (and sometimes walls) on these temples has clear antecedents in Gandharan conventions. Much of the architectural ornament in these temples is familiar to the Gandhara region and even the use of interior squinches and masonry domes is not new.
 What is new to the region is the Nagara modality of superstructure as it had developed in north India for the first time in the 5th and 6th centuries AD (Meister 1986, 1989). The shrine model on the wall of temple D at Bilot (Fig. A in box on Shrine Models) bears close resemblance to the much better known proto-Nagara shrine model represented on the early 6th-century doorway to the "Gupta" temple at Deogarh in central India, for example, or one on a brick stupa base at Nalanda in eastern India (Meister 1986:46-47).

 To frame this local and continuous craft tradition of the Salt Range and upper Indus, let me briefly review the remains in chronological order. At north Kafirkot (Fig. 7), temples B and A represent the earliest experiments in this region with the developing Nagara formula (Fig. 8). At Bilot (south Kafirkot) the much larger temple D awkwardly formulates a Nagara tower on a square base, much like the pre-Nagara temple at Bilesvara in Saurashtra in the 7th century (EITA:181-84), and incorporates a model of a proto-Nagara shrine on its walls (Fig. A in box on Shrine Models). Late in the 7th century, temple C at Kafirkot (Fig. 10) and temple A at Bilot (Fig. 11), both with damaged Nagara towers, project one central offset on each wall and modulate ornamental elements of their superstructures in a more integrated way compared to Bilot temple D (Fig. 9). These temples display a new confidence in and knowledge of Nagara formulas. Temple C tentatively introduces for the first time a version of north India's common vase-and-foliage capital for its corner pilasters, while retaining the local neo-Corinthian type for the central offset.
 Two striking temples, located on hills east of the Indus opposite Kalabagh at Mari-Indus-which I would date in the 8th century-continue and refine this local Nagara tradition, but still with only a single central offset on their walls (Fig. 12). Temple A places thin pilasters on the corners of each offset, while temple B pairs pilasters for the first time on its corner buttresses (Fig. 13). Temples in this sequence in turn seem to provide a central shrine model on each wall to represent a slightly earlier local experiment with the formula for a Nagara temple (see box on Shrine Models). Each also seems to carry forward some architectural element, as in the trefoil arched niches at Bilot (Fig. 9), the trefoil doorway at Mari-Indus, and the five-cusped entry to the smaller 9th-century temple at Amb (Fig. 14).
 The first temple in this tradition that can have its date confirmed by any evidence other than style and decorative context is the elegant fired brick structure at Kallar (Fig. 15). Its walls of five offsets (a central one with two on each side), and its developed ornamentation with vase-and-foliage pilasters and other distinctive details, place it parallel to temples in central and western India from late in the 8th and early in the 9th century AD. This date is supported by a single coin found near the foundations struck in the reign of the first Hindu Shahi ruler, Kalar, whose dynasty has recently been dated by an inscription as beginning in AD 821 (Rehman 1993:31). Only further archaeological explorations, however, and perhaps carbon-14 dating of wood beams used to support the interior domes of some of these temples, can fix more firmly the dates and historical frame suggested here.
 Early in the 8th century, perhaps, sub-shrines were added above the eastern corners of the platform supporting temple D at Bilot. These echo but reorient two domed cells sunk into the front corners of the temple's platform (Fig. 16). The small temple D at Kafirkot, built near the north gateway to that fort late in the 9th century, mimics some distinctive details of these sub-shrines.

 In the 10th century, larger temples were built under the patronage of the Hindu Shahi kings in the spectacular fortress at Amb (Fig. 18), at Bilot (Figs. 1, 17), and at Nandana (Fig. 19) on the eastern escarpment of the Salt Range. Like earlier ones of the region, these still were Latina temples (that is, they had single curvilinear spires), but  within their walls were stairways leading to an upper story where an interior ambulatory corridor surrounded an upper chamber embedded within the tower (Fig. 20a). In this respect they are unlike all other Nagara temples in India.
 This remarkable regional experiment with multiple levels, folded within a Latina tower (Figs. 17, 19-20), came to an end early in the 11th century. At that time the great fortress at Nandana on the eastern flank of the Salt Range fell to Mahmud of Ghazni, who sought to control the significant routes across the Panjab leading toward Multan and Delhi. The Hindu Shahi kings then took refuge with their cousins in Kashmir. In this sequence of Salt Range temples, only the last one, built at Nandana, suggests corner turrets on its single-spired tower (Figs. 19, 20a). These turrets remind us, however, of the multi-spired Nagara shrine models represented on the walls of the 10th-century Kashmir-related temple at Malot (Fig. 4), even as they reflect a multi-spired convention that became common in central and western India by the 9th/10th century (EITA).
 Across northern India, this multi-spired (sekhari) temple type sets a new standard in the 11th century at such famous sites as Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh, but its origins lie in experiments carried out in western India (Gujarat and Rajasthan) in the century before-experiments marked and reflected in these late Shahi temples in the Panjab.
 That these forts and temples survive along the Indus must be a reminder to us of how untouched many of India's traditions are; of how severely partition has truncated our understanding of South Asia's multiple civilizations, both Islamic and Hindu; and of our task as scholars to mend that historical wound, even as we have begun to reproblematize colonial scholarship and its assumptions.
 I end this preliminary report with a footnote to demonstrate the mighty weight of finding a new monument in the field. At the site of Mari, in addition to the two 8th-century temples already discussed (Fig. 12), there are also two mounds higher up the hill to the west, badly ravaged by treasure hunters, that past reports have labeled primarily as places of residence (Cunningham 1879; Mumtaz and Siddiq-a-Akbar 1989). These in fact are ruins of two large temples placed on high platforms. One, Temple C, still preserves remains of an inner sanctum and an enclosing ambulatory wall. On the north side, this wall preserves a central niche with a distinctive "Kashmiri-style" pent roof (Fig. E in box on Shrine Models), but the shattered remains of the temple's superstructure suggest instead a complex multi-spired tower with curvilinear Latina spirelets. This temple seems, in fact, to have been almost a reverse response to the unique local experiment with Kashmiri style found at Malot (Fig. 4), and an answer to it. Let scholars beware.

[Box 1]
Shrine Models as Signatures of Architectural Experimentation
 The architects of these temples in the Salt Range and along the Indus knew that they were working within a variety of options. Architecture could engage their creativity, and through their creative actions, temples could evolve in multiple ways. They seem consciously to have left a record of their architectural experiments by placing shrine models as niches on the walls of many temples. These often seem to represent slightly earlier local experiments with the formula for a Nagara temple, focusing on the nature of the temple's superstructure. Temple D at Bilot, for example, uses a proto-Nagara model (Fig. A). Temple B at Mari, on the other hand, uses curvilinear Nagara models with ornamentation placed across single cornice layers (Fig. B). In this respect the models at Mari resemble the superstructure actually built in the 7th century for Bilot's temple D rather than either superstructure built at Mari in the 8th century for temples A and B (Figs. 12, 13).
 On the 10th-century temple at Malot, the central shrine models have developed curvilinear Nagara towers flanked by extra turrets (Fig. D). Mari's remarkable temple C, on the other hand, had central niches marked by a split pent-roof pediment framing a trefoil arch (Fig. E) that suggests the gabled pent roof that once actually crowned the temple at Malot (Fig. 4). The trefoil-arch pattern can be seen at Bilot, Mari, Amb, and Malot in association with either pent-roofed or curvilinear formulas (Figs. A, C-E).
 Marking temple walls with images of past architecture provides an historical locus for architects working within a system of meaning which sees each niche as an expansion of the temple as a whole (Meister 1993). The rhetoric of architectural representation in South Asia more often relates to an ahistorical rather than historical reality, yet from time to time the two overlap (Dhaky 1977). In Gandhara sculpture, for example, the variety of recognizable Buddha types seems sometimes to point to specific places of pilgrimage. So also in the Salt Range, architectural experimentation gave contemporary expression to how the minds of its architects worked as well as providing a model of God's creation.

[Box 2]
The Integrated Salt Range and Indus Archaeological Project
 The 6th to 11th century forts, temples, and archaeological sites associated with the Turk Shahi and Hindu Shahi kings will be investigated over the next three years by a team led by Professors Abdur Rehman, Farid Khan, and Michael W. Meister under the auspices of the Pakistan Heritage Society, Peshawar, with a license from the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan. Preliminary excavations have begun this season in the fort at north Kafirkot.

Support for this project has come from the University Research Foundation and the Middle East Center at the University of Pennsylvania, the American Institute of Pakistan Studies, and the Lenkin Faculty Research Fund of the History of Art Department. I would like to thank Professor Farzand Durrani, past Vice-Chancellor of Peshawar University, for encouragement; the Department of Archaeology, Peshawar, for early support; Dr. M. Rafique Mughal, Director General of the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan; Shabaaz Khan, Director of the Panjab Department of Archaeology; and especially my colleagues Professors Abdur Rehman and Farid Khan of the Pakistan Heritage Society, with whom carrying out this work continues to be a pleasure.

Archaeological Survey of India
1904-22. Progress Reports, Frontier Circle and Northern Circle, and Annual Reports. Archaeological Survey of India.

Brown, Percy
1959 [1942]. Indian Architecture (Buddhist and Hindu). 3d rev. ed.

Coomaraswamy, Ananda K.
1927. History of Indian and Indonesian Art. New York: E. Weyhe.

Cunningham, A.
1871-82. Archaeological Survey of India, Reports. II (1871): 189; III (1872-73): 87-88; IV (1879): 25-35; IX (1882): 34.

Dhaky, M. A.
1977. The Indian Temple Forms in Karnata Inscriptions and Architecture. Delhi: Abhinav Publications.

Harle, J. C.
1986. The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent. New York: Viking Penguin.

Ingholt, Harald
1957. Gandharan Art in Pakistan. New York: Pantheon Books.

Kak, Ram Chandra
1933. Ancient Monuments of Kashmir. London: The India Society.

Khan, F. A.
1969. Architecture and Art Treasures in Pakistan. Karachi: Elite Publishers.

Lohuizen-De Leeuw, J. E. van
1959. "An Ancient Hindu Temple in Eastern Afghanistan." Oriental Art 5:61-69.

Marshall, John H.
1951. Taxila. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meister, Michael W., M. A. Dhaky, and Krishna Deva, eds.
1988/91. Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture [cited in text as EITA]. Vol. II, Pt. 1, Foundations of North Indian Style; Pt. 2, North India: Period of Early Maturity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Meister, Michael W.
1981. "Darra and the Early Gupta Tradition." In Chhavi II, Rai Krishna Dasa Felicitation Volume, Anand Krishna, ed., pp. 192-205. Banaras: Bharat Kala Bhavan.

1986. "On the Development of a Morphology for a Symbolic Architecture: India." Res, Anthropology and Aesthetics. 12:33-50.

1989. "Prasada as Palace: Kutina Origins of the Nagara Temple." Artibus Asiae. 49:254-80.

1993. "Fragments From a Divine Cosmology: Unfolding Forms on India's Temple Walls." In Gods, Guardians, and Lovers, Temple Sculptures from North India A.D. 700-1200, Vishakha N. Desai and Dari-elle Mason, eds., pp. 94-115. New York: The Asia Society.

Mumtaz, Kamil Khan, and Siddiq-a-Akbar, eds.
1989. Temples of Koh-e-Jud and Thar. Lahore: Anjuman Mimaran.

Nanavati, J. M., and M. A. Dhaky
1969. The Maitraka and the Saindhava Temples of Gujarat. Ascona: Artibus Asiae.

Rehman, Abdur
1993. "Date of the Overthrow of Lagaturman-the Last Turk Sahi Ruler of Kabul." Lahore Museum Bulletin 6:29-31.

1979. The Last Two Dynasties of the Sahis: An Analysis of Their History, Archaeology, Coinage and Paleography. Islamabad: Centre for the Study of the Civilizations of Central Asia.

Sehrai, Fidaullah
1979. Hund: the Forgotten City of Gandhara. Peshawar: Peshawar Museum.

Stein, Aurel
1937. Archaeological Reconnaissances in North-western India and South-eastern Iran. London: Macmillan.

Watters, Thomas, ed.
1904-05. On Yuan Chwang's Travels in India. London: The Royal Asiatic Society.

[Meister - Captions]

FIG. 1. Two groups of temples in the fort at Bilot, North West Frontier Province. The paired temples in the foreground (temples B and C) are of the 10th century. The cluster in the background (temple D in the center) is of the 7th century.

FIG. 2. Fifth-century facing added to the earlier Gandharan Buddhist Dharmarajika stupa at Taxila. Moldings, niche forms, and other architectural ornament are carried over into the Hindu temple tradition that follows.

FIG. 3. Map showing the Salt Range and other regions mentioned in text.

FIG. 4. Malot, near Kalar Kahar in the Panjab Salt Range. Main temple from the southwest, ca. 10th century. The roof of this structure would have been a pyramidal pent roof in Kashmiri fashion, but the shrine models on its walls are curvilinear and multi-spired.

FIG. 5. This 10th-century temple at Pandrethan in Kashmir offers a well-preserved example of a gabled pent roof.

FIG. 6. Katas, reconstruction of the superstructure of the southern sub-shrine. Similar reconstructions are being prepared for temples at Kafirkot and Bilot.
Reconstruction by the author; drawing by Patrick George

FIG. 7. Site map of the fort and temples at Kafirkot.
From the Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1921-22: pl. 26

FIG. 8. Kafirkot, temples A and B from southeast, ca. 6th/7th century. Note the slightly battered (sloped) walls and central niche and the stepped formula for the superstructure.

FIG. 9. Bilot, temple D from the south, ca. mid-7th century. Note the simple  proto-Nagara shrine model used to frame the central niche and the unlinked horizontal arrangement of its superstructure's ornament.

FIG. 10. Kafirkot, temple C, late 7th century. Here, perhaps for the first time, the walls of the temple step out, forming central offsets from an otherwise square plan.

FIG. 11. Bilot, temple A from the southwest, ca. late 7th century. This structure places framed niches at its corners, as well as on each central offset.

FIG. 12. Mari, on the east bank of the Indus near Kalabagh. Temples A and B, ca. 8th century.

FIG. 13. Mari, temple B from the south, ca. mid-8th century.

FIG. 14. Amb, near Sakesar on the southern edge of the Salt Range; temple A from the southeast, ca. 9th century. Only in this temple are an entry hall and its roof preserved.

FIG. 15. Kallar, brick temple from the south, ca. late 8th/9th century. The wall is divided into five parts, and all pilasters show a simplified vase-and-foliage patterning.

FIG. 16. Bilot, temple D and northeast sub-shrine (temple E). Temple E shows greater complexity than the central temple, both in the central offsets, with elegant false doorways, and in the complexity of the superstructure's ornamental patterning. Temple E stands above a domed chamber sunk in the temple's platform, but is oriented to the south instead of to the east (see Fig. 1).

FIG. 17. Bilot, temple C from the south, ca. mid-10th century. From the outside, this is single spired. On the inside, however, is an upper chamber and ambulatory path.

FIG. 18. Amb, temple B from the west, ca. early 10th century. British conservation early in the century has kept this three-chambered structure from collapse.

FIG. 19. Nandana fort, temple from the southwest, ca. AD 1000.

FIG. 20 a, b. Axonometric drawing and plans of the Nandana temple showing stairway, upper ambulatory, and chamber.
Reconstruction by the author; drawing by Hasina Choudhury

[box 1 figs]
FIG. A. Bilot, temple D.

Bottom, left to right:
FIG. B. Mari, temple B.

FIG. C. Mari, temple B.

FIG. D. Malot temple.

FIG. E. Mari, temple C.