|
From Pagano's to Pop's:
Alan Richman Remembers Penn Food of the '60s
Do you remember the Pub Tiki restaurant on the corner of 18th and Walnut
Streets? GQ magazine's food and restaurant critic, Alan Richman,
C'65, who is also the co-host of Dining Around (8:30 p.m. ET) on
TV's Food Network, even remembers what was on the Tiki's menu when he
took his first dinner date there in his senior year. "One of their
specialties was Sesame Chicken Aku Aku," Richman recalls, savoring the
name as if it were itself a delicacy. "White meat chicken in a white
veloute sauce with sesame seeds on the top. Sesame seeds were the most
exotic thing anyone had ever tasted back then," he adds.
"Another offering was Shrimp Bongo Bongo, which had both red and green
maraschino cherries to recommend it." Even though it was way off campus,
the Pub Tiki, with its exotic dishes, waterfall, and glowing map of
Polynesia, was the restaurant of choice for this College student who
wanted to impress his date in 1965. And while the enormously expensive
dinner ($15 for two) failed to win the lady's heart, the Shrimp Bongo
Bongo and the Chicken Aku Aku introduced Richman to the exotic fare that
would figure largely in his future.
Alan Richman's memories of Penn have the flavor of a Woody Allen
monologue -- devastating events and traumatic circumstances recounted at
the pace of a high-spirited rollercoaster ride. The words describe pain
but what registers most loud and clear is the humor. His first
reminiscence of Penn was of a summer biochemical research project spent
doing paper chromatography of porphyrins in a tiny, unventilated room,
using a solvent called pyridine. He cheerfully assured me that today's
faculty would react with horror when told about the conditions under
which he conducted his research. "Two drops of pyridine on the floor
near you and the smell would be so bad you'd run from the building
screaming." He first claimed that this experience turned him from
biochemistry into an English major but later confessed that a lack of
first-rate math skills made the crucial difference.
Richman came to Penn from New York as a General Honors student in the
first year of the program's existence. Instead of being honored by his
selection, however, Richman found the whole experience daunting. "It was
quite weird, because the program somehow became divided into the smart
kids and the dumb kids. After spending your whole life preparing to go
to college and be a smart kid, you find yourself in a small subcollege
of about 30 people, and I was one of the dumbest people there. And so, I
spent four years being a dumb kid. It was really tough."
To make things worse, Richman's roommate and fellow honors student, Jack
Finarelli, C'65, was a natural at chemistry. "When Jack took organic
chemistry, which was invented to make people suffer, he understood it
without studying," Richman remembers. "Jack could look at the page and
the molecules moved for him; he looked at a problem and knew the answer
right away. Meeting someone this smart was a novel experience for me,
and it made me feel really dumb." (Jack Finarelli went on to get his
Ph.D. and is currently working in research and development for the
Central Intelligence Agency in Virginia).
Traumatic as it was, it was also formative. Richman turned to the
Daily Pennsylvanian for solace and found the positive
reinforcement that drew him into journalism. By his senior year he was
co-editor of sports. After graduation he fulfilled his ROTC obligations
by doing a stint in the army, and then ended up at the Portland Indiana
Commercial-Review, working for fellow Penn alum Dan Rottenberg, C'64. In
1968, when Lyndon Johnson recalled the reserves in the midwest, Richman
did a tour in Vietnam, where he won a Bronze Star. (When asked to talk
about the experience, he demurs, saying only, "I'd like to say it was
for bravery, but I'm afraid it was awarded for consistently showing up
for work.") He then came back to Philly and went to work for the
Bulletin as a sports writer. One of the highlights (or perhaps
lowlights) of his Bulletin days was covering the 1972-73
Philadelphia 76ers -- he dubs them "the worst team in the history of
sports" in a recent article in Philadelphia magazine. After that,
Richman went on to write for some of the country's best-known
publications such as the New York Times, the Boston Globe,
and People magazine, before landing at GQ.
Given the lack of food options on campus in the '60s, it's not
surprising that Richman had trouble recalling Penn food. Food trucks, so
much a part of today's campus cuisine, were scarce. "I don't remember
them, but even if they were around, I probably wouldn't have gone there.
I have a Jewish mother who, to this day, believes you can die from the
germs that land on food that is eaten outside. I rarely ate in Kelly and
Cohen because my place was Pop's, a tiny hole-in-the-wall on Spruce
Street that served amazing sandwiches. Pop's was the greasiest spoon
I've ever seen but, since it had a roof on it and kept the soot out, it
fulfilled my criteria for cleanliness. Pop cut all his meat on the same
meat slicers, without ever washing it, and the cheese was free. To this
day I still dream of Pop's sandwiches."
Pagano's was still on Walnut Street, and Richman remembers his
pizza-eating contests with Jack Finarelli. Although Jack was the smaller
of the two and had to wait until the pizza cooled, he always won the
contest. "I'd always start first because it was too hot for Jack. He'd
just sit there smirking, like a cocky gunfighter knowing he has plenty
of time to draw. I would get two pieces down before he would even start,
but when he started to eat," Richman recounts in a reverential tone, "he
would have it finished before I had two more pieces eaten." And the
quality of the pizza? "They tasted exactly like frozen pizza. They had
this horrible crust and gummy cheese, and we ate them constantly and
loved them."
Since the food options were limited, Richman cooked for himself and
roommate Finarelli. Ground beef (at $.35 a pound) got made into meat
loaf, which was accompanied by a box of frozen veggies (usually Unity
brand corn or beans at $.10 a box). The beverage of choice was a packet
of Koolaid ($.05). Richman remembers the prices because he could make a
whole meal for $.50. Was he a good cook? "It was so disgusting that I'd
only eat one piece. But Finarelli, who could really eat, would finish
the whole thing. What I cooked was truly horrible, but I continued to
make meat loaf once a week throughout my Penn career."
For a year Richman was a member of a Jewish fraternity but left because
of the food. "The chef's name was Eddie Goldstein, and although I wasn't
Kosher and didn't pay much attention to the laws, Eddie managed to
offend even me. The first Passover meal that Eddie served had bacon in
it. "Ed, this is Passover, what's with the bacon?" Richman queried.
"What are you passin' over," Ed wanted to know. "Your food," Richman
snapped back with what may have been his first and shortest critique.
On the masthead of GQ, Alan Richman is listed as Special
Correspondent, not as the food and wine critic. This more accurately
describes Richman, whose journalism career has covered all the bases. In
fact, his food and wine writing began as side ventures, mainly because
he didn't want to specialize in such a low-paying field. Richman had
been doing the GQ wine column on a freelance basis when he joined
the staff. He agreed to continue and estimated that it would take about
30 percent of his time. "Then," Richman explains, "I started doing well
and winning awards, and now it takes up 90 percent of my time."
For many of us, this has to be the ultimate dream job, and Richman
concurs. Unfortunately, he has no tips for replicating his success. "I
believe that what you do has to find the right place -- the right fit --
and what I do belongs here. It's as simple as that -- plus some good
luck. When I freelance," he adds, "they edit the hell out of me. But
here at GQ they don't, so I've really found the place where I
fit. It took quite a long time and I moved around a lot before I found
my place. And I keep expecting it to change: I'm a pessimist who always
expects the sky to fall on my head."
And he fits with the audience as well. "Most critics think, at least to
some degree, about how healthy food is, but I never do. I've decided to
be totally hedonistic about food since so many of the things that are
supposed to be unhealthy turn out to be fads. I'll tell you if it's
disgusting or if it is boring, but I don't focus on the health aspects."
Richman also confesses to having a palate that people can relate to. "My
food tastes are pretty mainstream: the things I like, other people like;
the things I don't like, they don't like either. I got a big laugh out
of Ruth Reichl, the food critic for the New York Times by telling her
that she'd give any restaurant three stars if it served sardines. She
laughed and kind of agreed. But I would never do that," Richman adds
ingenuously, "but then I don't like sardines enough, and that's
certainly a mainstream attitude."
|