An
Injured Limb in Early 19th Century America
The deformation of a limb, accompanied by pain and discoloration, with
or without a wound was understood to be a broken bone by patients in the
nineteenth century. Most people could readily identify a broken bone,
although they were sometimes confused with contusions and dislocations.
Whenever possible, a doctor was called in to confirm the diagnosis and
perform the setting.
The treatment
involved three steps. First, the doctor would align the patient's bone
fragments as closely to their natural state as possible. Second, the wound
would be wrapped in a bandage before wood or leather splints were added
to stabilize the limb. Finally, the doctor would attempt to minimize the
possibility that the patient might re-break the limb by banging it through
slings and canes. In some cases, casts were formed around the limb with
plaster-like substances such as gutta percha.
A compound
fracture, the most severe and noticeable type of this injury, was an extremely
grave danger for a person in the first half of the nineteenth century.
A compound fracture--where the bone sticks out from the skin--necessitated
either surgery or a painful amputation. In addition to the extreme pain
of the injury and treatment--numbed somewhat by opium and alcohol--the
chances of recovery were often low. By some estimates, up to 40 to 50%
of those with compound fractures died as a result of complications from
surgery. (1)
In a practical manual on treating fractures from 1860, we can see the
author's opinion that treating fractures was mostly a matter of having
the proper touch, and not advanced training. This is consistent with the
fact that most physicians during this period were not able to offer their
patients care that was much beyond what they might receive at home from
a family member.
"Yet it is difficult to state the precise manner in which the surgeon
ought to proceed. Much will depend upon the circumstances of the case,
something upon one's natural tact, and upon the amount of experience,
but more, I think upon natural kindness of heart and social education.
The man of refinement and sensibility will know instinctively how to proceed
and needs no instruction. They who lack these qualities can never learn,
and it would be quite useless to undertake to teach them. I sincerely
wish such men as these latter would find some more suitable employment
than the practice of a humane art." (2)
Notes
1. Keen, William Williams, ed. Surgery: its Principles and Practices.
Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1909. Page 131.
2. Hamilton, Frank Hastings. Practical Treatise on Fractures and Dislocations.
Philadelphia: Blanchard & Lea, 1860. Page 52.