homepage    mcep   e-portfolio                  <-- PREVIOUS REFLECTION                NEXT REFLECTION -->
  Home            MCEP home     E-portfolio


Reflection 2: Use of Accurate Scientific Language

How the rubric item was addressed in this reflection:
This reflection shows how I have grown in my ability to accurately use scientific language to explain fundamental scientific concepts (not just to demonstrate increased vocabulary).

WHAT is the evidence? WHY did I choose the evidence? HOW does the evidence show growth?

Through participation in the MCE coursework, my ability to use accurate scientific language has improved as my grasp of concepts has improved.  I present 2 pieces of evidence (baseline and later) to show my growth in using scientific language to explain concepts.  In the following evidence, I show my improved understanding and use of



Evidence #1:
Re: Discussion of partition coefficients in discussing biotoxicity
Terms I understand better and use more accurately:
  • partition coefficient: a ratio of the concentration of a particular solute in two different mediums; in environmental chemistry, it can be used to express the lipophilic or lipophobic nature of the solute, as well as the volatility of the solute.
  • Kow : partition coefficient between octanol and water, high values indicate greater lipophilic nature
  • Kaw : partition coefficient between air and water (a.k.a. Henry's Law constant: partial pressure of gas above water = Kaw x concentration of gas in water), high values indicate greater volatility
  • Koa :partition coefficient between octanol and air, high values indicate greater lipophilic nature
The evidence below shows that I was still insecure in my understanding and use of partition coefficients terms (Koa,Kaw, Kow) as they applied to the exposure to and toxicity of substances in the environment.  The idea of a partition coefficient made sense to me mathematically before (i.e. I knew partition meant ratio), but until Chem505, my ability to connect these values to a substance's volatility (and thus mobility or tendency to disperse widely) and bioaccumulation (i.e. increased concentration in the fat tissues of organisms higher up the food chain) was still tenuous.
Baseline evidence:
  1. "Pre-exam" for Chem505: Question 2 and 4
    JUNE 2008
Later Evidence:
  1. Koa: "Post pre-exam" for Chem505: Question 2 and 4
    AUGUST 2008
  2. Kaw: PIM #1: the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation, ΔH, & Henry's Law Constant for PCB congener 56+60
    JULY 2008
  3. Problem set #9: Persistence, Bioaccumulation, Toxicity
    AUGUST 2008
  4. Kow :PIM #4: Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD)--brominated flame retardant (BFR) persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (PBT)
    AUGUST 2008

"Pre-exam":
(click on image for larger view)
preexam

An analysis of the baseline shows I was comfortable with the mathematical concept of a partition, or ratio, and that I had some idea of how this term was connected to lipid solubility.  I did not, however, have a concrete understanding of how this ratio was connected to bioaccumulation.

"Post pre-exam":
(click on image for larger view)
post exam

I have included the post pre-exam for symmetry--it shows that I did indeed strengthen my understanding of the partition coefficient (if looking merely at pre-/ post-exam grades, my growth in understanding was responsible for 50% of the total improvement in my grade, i.e. 2 of the 4 point improvement).

PIM #1: PCB (Congener 56+60): discussion of Henry's Law Constant, Kaw
JULY 2008
(click on image below for larger image of highlighted section)
Kaw pim 1
click here for full .pdf of original

In this piece of evidence, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation was used to determine the
ΔH from a set of temperature and partial pressure data at a particular site in Michigan.  In the course of the assignment, I learned that Kaw and ΔH have an inverse relationship.  Substances with low Kaw and high ΔH are not very volatile; substance with high Kaw and low ΔH, are volatile.  Volatile substance (those with Kaw and low ΔH) are much more likely to volatilize than remain dissolved in water because the energy it takes to vaporize it is low). 

Linking Kaw and ΔH to the relative location of the congeners' origin is a connection I had not made before.  A volatile substance will tend to have a non-local source; in contrast, a non-volatile substance (or low volatility substance) will tend to have a local source because it does not vaporize and travel far.  Thus, by looking at the air-water partition coefficient, Kaw , one can determine how mobile a substance is.  Those substance with high Kaw values can migrate far away from their location of origin.


PROBLEM SET #9: Persistence, Bioaccumulation, Toxicity
AUGUST 2008
(click on image below for larger image)
ps 9


PIM #4: HBCD: discussion of
Kow
AUGUST 2008
(click on image below for larger image of highlighted section)
pim4
click here for full .pdf of original

Back to top




Evidence #2:
Re: Discussion of semiconductors in Diode Lasers

Terms I understand better and use more accurately in explaining how diode lasers work:
  • p-doped semiconductor--a semiconductor that has a very small percentage of its ions replaced with electron deficient atoms; this produces  positively charged "holes" in the valence band which can act as charge carriers
  • n-doped semiconductor--a semiconductor that has a very small percentage of its ions replaced with atoms with more electrons than the original semiconductor; this produces excess electrons that occupy the conduction band and can act as charge carriers.
  • conduction band--refers to a small range of energy levels corresponding to the lowest energy antibonding orbitals
  • valence band--refers to a small range of energy levels corresonding to the highest energy bonding orbitals
  • pumping by electrical current--the application of a voltage that produces an electrical current; this electrical current maintains the inherent population inversion in a p-n junction necessary for light amplification.
The terms above are fairly specific to the field of semiconductors.  I have grown in my ability to use them accurately as I have increased in my understanding of how semiconductors in diode laser work.
Baseline evidence:
  1. Chem506 Class notes: introduction to semiconductors
    AUGUST 2008

  2. Lasers Preview Question (Quiz #5 in Chem507):
    FEBRUARY 2009
  3. Excerpt from Diode Laser Wiki (Chem507)
    MARCH 2009
  4. E-mail to Dr. Michael Topp re: diode lasers
    AUGUST 2009
Later Evidence:

  1. Explanation of chalk diagrams (drawn during conversation with Dr. Michael Topp in Chem508) and electronic image (e-mailed by Dr. Topp)
    AUGUST 2009
  2. Follow-up e-mail to Dr. Michael Topp re: diode lasers
    AUGUST 2009

As an Environmental Chemistry major, I had some understanding of the mechanisms underlying lasers because of my senior year (2001-2002) Physical Chemistry lab course where I learned about how dye lasers worked.  While diode lasers and LEDs (light emitting diodes) had, by that point, become ubiquitous in consumer applications (e.g. CD players, laser pointers), I did not connect the way in which they worked with what I had learned in my courses.  I  certainly don't recall having any substantive exposure to the chemical concepts underlying semiconduction.

The first piece of baseline evidence shows where I first meaningfully encountered terms related to semiconductors, and began my understanding of the molecular and energetic properties that makes semiconduction possible.
 
I recorded the notes in large part because I found the topic quite interesting, even though I didn't fully understand it.  In this evidence, you see my first exposure to the terms n-doping and p-doping, as well as an introduction to the concept of a band gap that separates a conduction band from a valence band and the concept of applying a potential (voltage) to a semiconductor to produce light or electricity.  My understanding, however, was still passive, and I did not understand these terms well enough to teach or explain the concept with much clarity or accuracy.

Chem506 notes on semiconductors:
(click on image for larger view)
notes

The second piece of baseline evidence shows what I recalled about the properties and applications of lasers. 
I remembered their coherent, monochromatic, colinear nature (a result of the amplification produced during stimulated emission in an appropriate laser cavity).  I also recalled some applications.  This evidence shows the beginning of a shift where I had to produce evidence of my understanding.

Laser Preview Question:
(click on image for larger view)
laser preview question

The third and fourth piece of evidence (and excerpt from a diode laser wiki assignment in Chem506 and an e-mail exchange with Professor Topp in Chem508, respectively) shows how I interpreted and synthesized outside resources as I began to create my own understanding of how diode lasers worked.  In examining these documents, it is clear that I was still mixing up ideas and producing a Frankenstein-like amalgam of conceptual understanding.  I had a difficult time differentiating between the way in which non-diode, optically pumped lasers and diode, electrically pumped lasers achieved and maintained population inversion.  A quote from the last piece of evidence summarizes my fluency in using these terms: "a bit labored and not completely accurate."

Excerpt from Diode Laser Wiki:
(click on image to go to larger view)
diode wiki


E-mail to Dr. Topp:
(click on image to go to larger view)
email to top

Specifically, I did not realize that the p-n junction of a diode already produces an artificially created population inversion because of the structure of an n-doped and p-doped semiconductor.  An electrical current is used to pump the diode laser to maintain the original pre-existing population inversion, which allows for light amplication.  Without the current, the extra electrons from the n-conductor would relax into the holes of the p-conductor and produce an electrically neutral region (effectively quenching the ability to produce light). 


The first piece of baseline evidence shows how I have integrated semiconductor terminology into my lexicon.  Specifically, I have used my own phrasing while accurately using the scientific terms--this shows I have progressed from merely parroting or copying terminology and explanations from an external source to being able to generate my own explanations.  I am fairly comfortable that I could explain or teach the underlying concept now (at this level).

 Explanation of the P-N Junction (chalk and electronic diagram):
chalk2
pnjunction
P-doped and N-doped semiconductors
The p-n junction of a diode occurs at the boundary between a p-doped semiconductor and an n-doped semiconductor.  The n-doped semiconductor is made by doping with atoms with an extra electron, which must occupy the conduction band because the valence band is fully occupied.  In the p-doped semiconductor, there are "holes" or vacancies in the valence band due to doping with electron deficient atoms.

The Natural Population Inversion of a P-N Junction
The specific properties of each semiconductor (i.e. "holes" in the valence band and extra electrons in the conduction band, respectively) produce a natural population inversion when the two types of semiconductors are brought together.

Pumping
As the conduction band electrons relax and occupy the "holes," the population inversion can only be maintained by applying an potential that removes electrons from the p-type semiconductor and replenishes the electrons in the n-type semiconductor (i.e. applying a voltage that produces a current). The application of this potential is only used to pump the diode laser to maintain the original pre-existing population inversion and allow for continuous lasing action.  Without the current, the extra electrons from the n-conductor would relax into the holes of the p-conductor and produce an electrically neutral region (effectively quenching the ability to produce light).

Diode lasers, compared to other lasers (e.g. dye lasers)

Similarities. Diode laser and other lasers share general charateristics.  Both must maintain a population inversion to produce the signature amplification of light that occurs with stimulated emission.  Likewise, both diode lasers and other lasers must have some type of resonant laser cavity that aids in this process.  For both types of lasers, the relaxation of an electron across the band gap produces light emission.

Differences.  In diode lasers, the population inversion exists because of the nature of the p-n junction (even before voltage is applied).  Voltage is applied (i.e. the diode is pumped with an electric current) only to maintain this population inversion.  In non-diode lasers, the population inversion typically does NOT exist before the laser is pumped.  Furthermore, the resonant laser cavity in a diode laser is often the gap within the p-n junction itself, whereas the resonant laser cavity in a non-diode laser is typically a long columnar tube in which the laser medium resides.


The second piece of evidence shows positive feedback that indicates my growth in understanding and ability to use terms related to diodes and diode lasers.


Follow-up e-mail to Dr. Topp:
(click on image to go to larger view)
follow up email



Back to top